In response to Campbell's questioning, Ana told Campbell to leave and tried to push him off the bed with her feet. If the trial court's ruling is at least “within the zone of reasonable disagreement,” we will not interfere. DISCUSSIONRule 901 of the Texas Rules of Evidence provides a nonexclusive list of methods for authentication of evidence. In analyzing whether the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court's ruling, we start by noting that the content of the messages themselves purport to be messages sent from a Facebook account bearing Campbell's name to an account bearing Ana's name. Accordingly, we examine whether the remaining evidence supports the trial court's ruling. She just take it as like a joke thing, but she were hitting me hard.
Following dinner, the couple returned home, and Campbell continued to question Ana about the message. For example, evidence may be authenticated by testimony from a witness with knowledge that a matter is what it is claimed to be. She also testified that she did not send them to herself. Thus, Campbell's own testimony was that he struck Ana. For example, Campbell testified at trial, “I took the knife, but I never pointed to [Ana].This is the only way to ensure that every aspect is covered.Precision often is the only difference that distinguishes good from great and we want our students to clearly exhibit that next level of cognition that sets them apart from the rest.It had once served an Office Expo, but that store was long closed. “I just had the biggest fight ever with my wife,” he told his teenage lover.The lot was in a secluded area of Farmers Branch, hidden from main roads. “I think it’s over.” As she was trying to process what he was telling her, a police car pulled up next to them.The jury awarded more than million in punitive and compensatory damages.